Enterprise finance teams move to Fintastic when their models slow down, their scenarios stop fitting, and their teams spend more time maintaining the platform than analyzing the business.
A 45-minute conversation about where your current planning environment is slowing your team down.
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)


.png)
.png)
.png)
Three things shift when finance teams move from a fragmented planning environment to Fintastic. Cycle time drops. Coverage expands. The team gets out of maintenance mode.
Test pricing, headcount, or M&A scenarios in real time. The CFO meeting drives the analysis, not the other way around.
Data integration belongs between your operating systems and your planning platform, not within it. Finance, revenue, workforce, and operations plan from one model, with no movement between modules or workspaces.
No Center of Excellence required. No systems integrator on retainer for every change. Analysts can build and maintain models themselves.
Natural-language queries across your planning data, with permissions intact. No switching between application-specific agents.
A focused comparison on the dimensions that matter most for enterprise planning.
Comparison based on publicly available product documentation and customer accounts as of 2026. Anaplan’s product roadmap may introduce changes to capabilities described above.
15 minutes across five interconnected models, down to 13 seconds in one.
"In my finance career, it’s rare to see an interconnected platform of this scale support iterative scenario planning without sacrificing speed or reliability. Fintastic has been a meaningful addition for Priceline."
Security and compliance built in, not bolted on.
Fintastic uses one unified architecture that handles both dense and sparse data, while Anaplan requires choosing between two separate engines (Classic and Polaris) on different workspaces. Fintastic supports unlimited concurrent users with auto-scaling and lets finance, revenue, workforce, and operations plan in one model, with no data movement between modules.
Enterprise deployments typically take 4 to 6 months. Customer teams reach self-sufficient model building proficiency within 3 to 4 weeks. The weekly time commitment is significantly lower than typical Anaplan implementations — most Fintastic customers spend 3 to 5 hours per week versus 20 to 25 hours on legacy platforms.
No. Fintastic is designed for your team to own the build. Analysts can build and maintain models themselves without a dedicated Center of Excellence or a systems integrator on retainer for ongoing changes.
Fintastic uses subscription pricing based on company size (revenue and employee count) with unlimited users, unlimited data, and ongoing support included. Anaplan combines a platform fee, tiered user licenses (Model Builder, Power User, Read-Only), per-application module costs, and workspace-bound usage with upcharges for additional workspace as you grow.
Yes. Fintastic offers co-implementation that lets you run in parallel with your existing platform during transition. Your team retains full ownership of the build throughout the migration.
Fintastic’s implementation team co-builds the new models with your team using the unified architecture. There is no equivalent to Anaplan’s Classic-to-Polaris workspace rebuild, since Fintastic handles dense and sparse data on one architecture from the start.
From first call to live deployment, here's what changes when you move planning to Fintastic.
Subscription based on company size, with no per-seat surprises.
Option to run in parallel with your existing platform during transition.
No required Center of Excellence, no integrator on retainer.
45 minutes with our team. We look at where your current planning environment is slowing your team down, and where Fintastic could change the equation.